<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US GOV: The Judiciary Archives - Daniel Aaron Lazar</title>
	<atom:link href="https://daniellazar.com/category/us-gov-the-judiciary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 08:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rulings 2010-11</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2011/06/30/supreme-court-rulings-2010-11/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Early Years]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/?p=2507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The US Supreme Court is rendering rulings on the cases from this year&#8217;s docket. There are several interesting cases. Here are all of the slip opinions. Here is some top-notch editorializing on the rulings from Slate&#8217;s Dalia Lithwick who, in my humble opinion, offers remarkably insightful yet accessible court journalism.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2011/06/30/supreme-court-rulings-2010-11/">Supreme Court Rulings 2010-11</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Breyer: The Court, The Cases And Conflicts</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2010/10/21/justice-breyer-the-court-the-cases-and-conflicts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/?p=2233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>n Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge&#8217;s View, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer outlines his ideas about the Constitution and about the way the United States legal system works. Breyer, who was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Clinton in 1994, explains that he interprets the Constitution as a living document, in opposition to some &#8230; <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2010/10/21/justice-breyer-the-court-the-cases-and-conflicts/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Justice Breyer: The Court, The Cases And Conflicts</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2010/10/21/justice-breyer-the-court-the-cases-and-conflicts/">Justice Breyer: The Court, The Cases And Conflicts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explaining The American Filibuster</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2010/02/13/explaining-the-american-filibuster/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: Constitution Primer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/?p=2009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If high-school government class taught us anything, it&#8217;s that getting bills passed through Congress is a game of numbers: The bill with the most votes wins. Turns out it&#8217;s not that simple. These days, the polarized state of American politics means that major bills need at least 60 votes to avoid an inevitable filibuster by &#8230; <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2010/02/13/explaining-the-american-filibuster/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Explaining The American Filibuster</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2010/02/13/explaining-the-american-filibuster/">Explaining The American Filibuster</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1st Amendment: The Supreme Court mauls the law banning animal-cruelty videos</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-supreme-court-mauls-the-law-banning-animal-cruelty-videos/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/?p=1847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Witness the American deputy solicitor general in his natural habitat—the Supreme Court. As Neal Katyal roams softly across the cool marble chamber, he has no idea what awaits him. He is here to protect his tribe—the U.S. government—which, in 1999, passed a statute making it a crime to create, sell, or possess &#8220;any visual or &#8230; <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-supreme-court-mauls-the-law-banning-animal-cruelty-videos/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">1st Amendment: The Supreme Court mauls the law banning animal-cruelty videos</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-supreme-court-mauls-the-law-banning-animal-cruelty-videos/">1st Amendment: The Supreme Court mauls the law banning animal-cruelty videos</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The high court looks again at religious symbols on public lands</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-high-court-looks-again-at-religious-symbols-on-public-lands/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Constitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-high-court-looks-again-at-religious-symbols-on-public-lands/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s just one person at oral argument in Salazar v. Buono this morning who really wants to talk about whether a 5-foot cross on federal government land in the Mojave National Preserve violates the Constitution&#8217;s Establishment Clause. But Justice Antonin Scalia really, really wants to talk about it. He looks particularly queasy when Peter Eliasberg—the &#8230; <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-high-court-looks-again-at-religious-symbols-on-public-lands/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">The high court looks again at religious symbols on public lands</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2009/10/12/the-high-court-looks-again-at-religious-symbols-on-public-lands/">The high court looks again at religious symbols on public lands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2008 Docket</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2008/10/06/the-2008-docket/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 05:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/?p=1220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The NY Times offers a sneak peek of the Supreme Court Docket here</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2008/10/06/the-2008-docket/">The 2008 Docket</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interviews with Supreme Court Justices</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2007/10/07/interviews-with-supreme-court-justices/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/2007/10/07/interviews-with-supreme-court-justices/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>1. Charlie Rose with Former Cheif Justice William H. Rehnquist in 1998 2. Charlie Rose with Former Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor in 2002 3. Charlie Rose with O&#8217;Connor and Stephen Breyer 4. Charlie Rose with Stephen Breyer 5. Fresh Air Interview with Jeffrey Tooblin on his book &#8220;Nine Inside the Robes&#8221; Fresh Air Interview with &#8230; <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2007/10/07/interviews-with-supreme-court-justices/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Interviews with Supreme Court Justices</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2007/10/07/interviews-with-supreme-court-justices/">Interviews with Supreme Court Justices</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Justice Breyer on &#039;Active Liberty&#039;</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2007/09/14/supreme-court-justice-breyer-on-active-liberty/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/2007/09/14/supreme-court-justice-breyer-on-active-liberty/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a new book Justice Stephen Breyer, often at odds with Scalia and Thomas, outlines his judicial philosophy, and makes the argument that his is in fact a more democratic philosophy. The book is called Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution. &#8220;I say &#8216;active liberty&#8217; because I want to stress that democracy works if &#8212; &#8230; <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2007/09/14/supreme-court-justice-breyer-on-active-liberty/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Supreme Court Justice Breyer on &#039;Active Liberty&#039;</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2007/09/14/supreme-court-justice-breyer-on-active-liberty/">Supreme Court Justice Breyer on &#039;Active Liberty&#039;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Marshall Court</title>
		<link>https://daniellazar.com/2007/09/08/the-marshall-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US GOV: The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USH: Early Years]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/2007/09/08/the-marshall-court/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Marshall Cases Reading Marshall Cases Response Grid DBQ on Marshall Cases DBQ Hints</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://daniellazar.com/2007/09/08/the-marshall-court/">The Marshall Court</a> appeared first on <a href="https://daniellazar.com">Daniel Aaron Lazar</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
